Better in their words…

Biden’s psyops team spanks Zelensky; Western mercs dying to show tactical failure; weatherman coin new terms for giant hail; jabbed overwhelm Ozzie hospitals; study exposes jab issues; fun vids; more.

Source: GORILLA HAIL ☙ Sunday, June 2, 2024 ☙ C&C NEWS

WORLD NEWS AND COMMENTARY

🔥 Yesterday, the Financial Times offered the latest example of a rare, misleading psywar tool, in an article beguilingly headined, “US to offer Ukraine security pact as tensions rise between allies.” In short, the deep state just showed Zelensky the whip hand.

Though the article was framed as a positive development for Ukraine — a possible security pact! — it was really meant for Deep State Daddy to take little Zelensky out to the woodshed for a spanking he won’t soon forget.

The optimistic potential security deal story almost immediately dissolved into a harangue of ugly quotes by four anonymous Ukrainian government officials. They all criticized regime renegade Vladimir Zelensky, now past his presidential expiration date and teetering precariously in his ill-defined political position.

To ensure he didn’t miss Sugar Daddy Biden’s message, the article’s third paragraph explained exactly what Zelensky did to earn the wrath of US war managers. Zelensky criticized President Peters and called him ‘weak’:

From there, FT assembled its family intervention. Its first anonymous Ukrainian official — one of Zelensky’s own employees — complained Zelensky was single-handedly souring Ukraine’s relationship with the United States, and was putting its possible sweet security deal — the dangled carrot — at risk:

The deep-state affiliated newsmag then dumped its gunnysack of U.S. complaints against poor Volodomyr:

• A nasty memo from Zelensky’s office telling his officials to “criticise both Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping for not attending the peace summit;”
• Ukraine’s drone strikes on Russian oil infrastructure (raising gas prices) and on Russia’s nuclear attack warning radar sites; and
• Zelensky’s recent purge of US-favored officials and military commanders.

You know Biden. He’s a pugilist. He can’t put up with that kind of backtalk from a toady. So FT rhetorically stripped the silk glove off Biden’s iron spanking hand. The next anonymous quote from another senior Ukrainian official suggested Zelensky is losing his damned mind:

The next quote said Zelensky is getting more and more paranoid:

What usually happens to war rulers who get too greedy, too paranoid, and start having nervous breakdowns?  Historically, rulers who get too paranoid and bite too many hands tend to exit the world stage feet first. Especially former actors.

The trouble started when Zelensky got chapped over his so-called global peace summit, which he organized like a child’s birthday party. First, he snubbed the Russians on purpose by not inviting them. (It’s fair to ask how he intends to negotiate peace without the other party to the conflict.) So far, so good. But then the comedic pianist got his feelings hurt when China announced President Xi couldn’t make it. Worse, Biden then sent his regrets, insultingly explaining he had to attend a small donor fund-raiser instead — the thinnest of excuses.

Now nobody important is coming to Zelensky’s birthday party, I mean peace summit.

The article’s final paragraphs delivered the real message to the former comedian. Citing an even bigger group of anonymous members of his government, plus a fourth anonymous senior official, rounding out a giant anonymous soccer team, the Financial Times told Zelensky, as if he were a moody teenager, to stop being so ungrateful:

Over the last two years, we’ve seen this kind of article from time to time, similar hit job pieces on Ukraine or Zelensky. They always pop up out of nowhere in reliable government-controlled corporate media. It used to tempt me to conclude the winds of support were shifting. But the stories would always immediately disappear, poof, gone with the political wind, nothing but dial tone, never to call back or otherwise resurface.

And always anonymous.

I’ve learned that what we’re watching is the US’s disciplinary process. Whenever Zelensky gets out of hand and, like a human snapping turtle, nips at the hand feeding him gunpowder cookies and Italian villas, they just run another hit job article to show the misbehaving quasi-president what could happen if he doesn’t jump back into the handouts line where he belongs.

Read critically.

🚀🚀 Last week, Business Insider ran an unintentionally revealing story dramatically (and ironically) headlined, “Western fighters in Ukraine are getting killed because they assumed the war would be easy, says a US veteran who fought there.” Some of those fighters are learning mind your own beeswax the hard way. (Note before visiting the linked article, it’s loaded with f-bombs.)

Of course, since the last tablespoon of honest journalism long ago dribbled out of the bottom of the media’s septic tank, the story was based on an anonymous source. BI did not even bother explaining why its source required anonymity.

In any case, the source was described as a U.S. veteran who later fought in Iraq as a private contractor, and was a mercenary who fought in Ukraine until last December. He said he’s seen lots of other Western mercenaries killed in Ukraine because they assumed the fight would be easy. Apparently the problem is that, during fifty years of global dominance, while the U.S. was only fighting terrorists and insurgents, we’ve always dominated the battlefield:

But now, the fight is against a near-peer nuclear superpower with a real army that employs sophisticated military tactics and uses advanced — in some cases superior — weapons. One catastrophic result is that, unlike in every other recent U.S. conflict, there’s no safe place to rest and recover in Ukraine. If you stand still for more than ten seconds, your grey matter is likely to migrate somewhere besides sitting atop your shoulders.

In a related article published earlier this month, BI quoted U.S. veteran Carl Larson, who commanded a 25-man unit in Ukraine. Larson echoed the same sentiments as did BI’s anonymous correspondent:

In other words, normal U.S. military procedures and training are useless this time. “You have to be willing to relearn everything that you’ve been taught,” Larson explained. Describing the conditions as being more like the apocalyptic trench-scapes of World War I, he said Western fighters have to learn a whole new way of fighting. Which underscored the question of whether or not NATO has been properly training Ukrainians for this fight:

This war is completely different from any other war the U.S. or NATO allies have fought in the lifetimes of living generals. I’m no military expert, but it raises profound questions about the wisdom of a war-by-committee conducted by remote analysts and armchair generals making life-and-death decisions from their overstuffed recliners in a secure base in Germany.

I’m just saying.

🔥🔥 This week was bookended by two headlines that told the entire story. First, behold Fox’s Friday headline:

Nazi propagandist Josef Goebbels infamously said, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” Alex Soros appears to be vying for Goebbels’s spot in history’s villainous wax museum.

But I digress. Compare that Fox headline to this one, run by Axios yesterday:

So. Is Alex Soros the dog’s tail? Or, who’s wagging Biden?

Parental-rights warrior Frank McCormick promptly noticed a double-standard:

It’s a good question. And I’d like to know why liberals are using the offensive and discriminatory label “felon,” instead of respectfully calling President Trump a “justice-impacted individual?”

🌪️🌪️ The Washington Post ran an extreme-weather story yesterday with the reassuring headline, “Massive hail storms keeping hitting the U.S. Here’s why.”  The understated sub-headline added, “Baseball-sized hail hit the Denver region Thursday night, the latest storm in what has not been a quiet hail year.” And — spoiler alert — despite the headline’s confident promise, the story never actually explained why it’s happening.

Matthew the meteorologist looks so happy about his giant hailstone, doesn’t he? For lack of any better word, people are starting to call this stuff ‘gorilla hail,’ which seems snappy and appropriate but is probably racist or anti-nativist or something. So don’t get too attached to it.

Anyway, hail collecting is endless fun and games and weather seek-and-find, until this happens:

YOUTUBE: Storm Chaser versus Gorilla Hail (11:19).

In a related story published just two days earlier, the WaPo ran a much more descriptive headline. The new hail is so big and unprecedented they’re having to create new vocabulary:

Everything is bigger in Texas. Even gorilla hail. After rambling incoherently for a dozen paragraphs about possible causes like climate change and urban sprawl, the article finally admitted that scientists remain baffled:

They knew everything there was to know about a novel coronavirus, but there is still much to learn about hail.

Hail is frozen water, or ice. Heat melts ice. If the Earth is heating up, then the water should be less frozen, not more. So something else must be afoot. The weather scientists are warning it’s going to get worse, referring to another new weather concept I’ve never heard of, the billion-dollar hailstorm disaster:

Or it could just be media climate alarmism. What do you think? Do we need new words for  new weather events? Or is nothing unusual actually happening besides media hysteria?

💉💉 They keep telling us the jabs prevent hospitalizations. Two days ago, the Daily Mail reported that in mega-vaccinated Australia, hospitals are being overwhelmed with new covid cases and are rationing care again:

The number of patients Down Under has spiked. It’s almost double last year’s figures. Worse, hundreds of hospital staff are out sick, compounding the problem.

The Mail advised more jabs. Well, it’s not like they’re going to recommend ivermectin or anything. [ROF]  What else are they supposed to say?

💉 A new preprint study (not yet peer-reviewed) with a football team’s worth of 23 industry-connected authors published this week on MedRxIV, titled “OpenSAFELY: Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents.” While the study did its level best to shore up the jabs for kids, it accidentally dropped a giant truth bomb. Its conclusion actually undermined the shots, especially for kids, and provided us with another terrific example of how to read studies critically.  [This study is a total snow job. mrossol]

When evaluating a scientific study, before you do anything else, first jump down to the end, and read the Conflict of Interest Statement. This example raised several red flags:

Author Ben Goldacre is up to his scientific neck in lefty, pharma, and government connections. Apart from all his work for the NHS and the World Health Organization, his funding from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation raised a big flag. The Foundation is a liberal philanthropath (as Margaret Anna Alice would say) that, when not meddling in pharmaceutical research, funds far-left liberal causes like no-bail policy initiatives.

The statement tells us Ben also lectures on the ‘misuse of science’ — meaning he’s a narrative enforcer.

Brian MacKenna is an NHS employee, probably involved in the jab rollout. Ian Douglas is funded by and even owns part of a big pharmaceutical company that makes vaccines. So.

The study disclosed it was mainly funded by the Wellcome Trust, a vast, globally-influential British philanthropathy that also funds ‘climate change science,’ was established in 1936 by a big pharma billionaire (Henry Wellcome), and lately seems peculiarly fascinated with biomedical veterinaryresearch. Ahem.

None of the children or adolescents in the NHS database died from covid. Zero. Out of 552,000 unvaccinated kids, only three covid cases required critical care (a number far too small to represent as a percentage). Admittedly, those three cases were all in unvaccinated adolescents (12-17). But with only three reported cases, it was hardly statistical proof of jab efficacy.

Meanwhile, researchers found fifteen cases of pericarditis and three cases of myocarditis among 839,000 vaccinated kids. All three myocarditis cases and twelve of the pericarditis cases were found in the adolescent group.

In other words, myocarditis and pericarditis cases only happened to the jabbed kids! They found zero cases of heart injuries in the unvaccinated children.

To reassure readers, the authors disclosed there wasn’t “enough data” on covid-related adverse events in the children (5-11) group. Meaning, there were none. The younger kids had no significant problems with covid. But the data still reported ER visits and ‘unexpected hospitalizations’ only for the vaccinated children.

So … were the ‘unexpected hospitalizations’ caused by the jabs? They didn’t speculate.

After sorting through all the noise, the bottom line was the NHS data shows only vaccinated children had ER visits, hospitalizations, and heart injuries, and only vaccinated adolescents’ hearts were damaged. And none of the kids died from covid.

Somebody will have to explain it to me again. Why do ‘the benefits’ of covid vaccination outweigh the risks of possibly permanent heart injury, when data shows no risk of death, and small absolute risk even of covid hospitalization? Why not just let the kids catch covid and get over it naturally?

I know, this ground has been well covered. But the science, long wandering the trail behind us, is finally catching up to the wagon of truth.

🔥🔥 The Breakfast Club, America’s top black radio talk radio program, hosted by Charlamagne Tha God, took callers on Friday responding to the Trump conviction. The hosts asked callers, “Now that Trump is a convicted felon, does that change your mind?” While the hosts gamely tried to hold the line for Biden, it got off to a bad start when the first caller asked, “How can anybody black vote for Biden?”

CLIP: Caller 1 — Breakfast Club — the narrative goes down in flames (2:48).

CLIP: Caller 2 — Breakfast Club — the narrative goes down in flames (1:45).

CLIP: Caller 3 — Breakfast Club — the narrative goes down in flames (1:32).

CLIP: Caller 4 — Breakfast Club — the narrative goes down in flames (1:57).

After taking four callers who all were still voting for Trump, the hosts had enough. Charlamagne shook his head and said, “Democrats, y’all in trouble come November. You got to stop talking about how bad Donald Trump is. Ya’ll better start talking about the good that Biden is doin’ and stop focusing so much on the negative Trump is doing. ”

Charlamagne’s co-host prompted, “Touché, so now tell us some of the good that Biden been doing.”

“That’s not my job,” Charlamagne promptly answered, to guffaws from his co-hosts.

It’s not my job either.

Have a blessed and rewarding Sunday! Thank you for all your loyal support. Tune back in to the Coffee & Covid show tomorrow morning for a week-starting roundup of essential news and snarky commentary.

Share

We can’t do it without you. Consider joining with C&C to help move the nation’s needle and change minds.  I could use your help getting the truth out and spreading optimism and hope, if you can:  ☕ Learn How to Get Involved 🦠

How to Donate to Coffee & Covid
Twitter: jchilders98.
Truth Social: jchilders98.
MeWe: mewe.com/i/coffee_and_covid.
Telegram: t.me/coffeecovidnews
C&C Swag! www.shopcoffeeandcovid.com