Federalist CEO Sean Davis Doubles Down
July 17 | Posted by mrossol | American Thought, Deep State, FBI, NSA, TrumpVery interesting theory. Would take a lot of coordination; but to think the shooter acted alone? That is very difficult to swallow, too. So. mrossol
Source: (7) Federalist CEO Sean Davis Doubles Down – by Mark Wauck
|
|
Follow the link. Davis puts his arguments into article form:
Biden’s Team Deliberately Kneecapped Trump’s Security To Allow An Assassination Attempt
They kept the rooftop open, watched the shooter, kept Trump on the stage, and didn’t do a damn thing until after he had been shot. And we’re supposed to believe it was an innocent oopsie?
Follow the link for the details of Davis’ presentation. He lays a lot of stress on the fact that we know for a fact that the TLAs (three letter agencies) have engaged in manufacturing events of this sort. Here are the last few paragraphs, which partly repeat the sub title:
At some point, you just have to say enough with the lies. We saw what they did with the Russia hoax. We saw the Kavanaugh hoax. We saw the Covid origin hoax. We saw the Ukraine hoax, the stolen election, the J6 op, and then the armed Mar-a-Lago raid and the myriad illegal cases against Trump.
That’s the short list. Elsewhere in the article he brings up the Whitmer FBI kidnapping case. There are additional examples.
They called him Hitler. They said he was an existential threat. They said he would destroy democracy. They said he was the most dangerous person on Earth. Then they denied him security. They kept the rooftop open. They watched the shooter and did nothing. They kept Trump on that stage. And they didn’t do a damn thing until after he had been shot in the head.
And we’re all supposed to believe it was just an innocent oopsie?
Is this fact? Not yet. It’s a theory, but a theory based on facts. As such, in my opinion theories that presume intentional agency are to be preferred to the assumption of hard to believe incompetence. An investigation is not a trial—there should be no presumption of innocence. In any case the federal TLAs have forfeited any such presumption, if there ever was one. There are too many converging factors to simply assume that the multiple security failures were coincidence. Davis’ theory that some person(s) within the command chain intentionally allowed a window of opportunity for Trump to be assassinated. For a professional investigation, it strikes me that Davis’ theory should be the theory that is the working model, the one that has to be disproved before considering the possibility of incompetence.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.