Better in their words…

So ‘they’ oppose environmental damage?
======
WSJ 8/11/2017

By Jillian Kay Melchior

In front of an Iowa government building, two women admitted to an eight-month campaign of arson, vandalism and sabotage targeting the Dakota Access Pipeline. “Some may view these actions as violent, but be not mistaken,” said Ruby Montoya, 27. “We acted from our hearts and never threatened human life nor personal property.”

But Ms. Montoya and her cohort, 35-year-old Jessica Reznicek, admitted they had engaged in electionnight arson that destroyed several pieces of heavy machinery and caused as much as $2.5 million in damage. They also said they had repeatedly used oxyacetylene torches to cut through pipe, delaying construction for weeks. And they claimed they had deployed gassoaked rags and burning tires to destroy electrical units and construction equipment along the Iowa portion of the pipeline’s 1,172-mile route. Ms. Reznicek said she hopes her confession will “empower others to act boldly, with purity of heart,” and commit similar acts of vandalism. Even as they spoke, the two women took out a hammer and crowbar, tearing apart a sign on state property before they were arrested.

Over the past year, pipeline opponents have resorted to unlawful tactics with alarming frequency. The environmental left, which has made a special cause of pipelines, assumes that if it can disrupt the transportation of traditional energy, oil and gas will remain trapped in the ground.

The most serious incident took place several months ago in Citrus County, Fla. Antipipeline activist James Leroy Marker used a highpowered rifle to damage the Sabal Trail Pipeline. He then fled in his car, spurring state troopers and sheriff’s deputies to give chase. When Marker finally stopped, he “engaged the deputies and the trooper, armed with a firearm,” the sheriff’s department said. The officers shot him dead.

Though some environmentalists decried Marker’s actions, the response was far from unanimous. A video posted to the Facebook page of the green nonprofit Balance for Earth lauded Marker as someone who “stood up and took an action on behalf of all of us.” It was viewed more than 48,000 times before its quiet removal.

Likewise, a blog for the Sabal Trail Resistance, an activist group dedicated to protesting the pipeline, said: “We feel that focusing on honoring the sacrifice Marker made to take a stand against this pipeline is of a greater immediate importance than debating the strategy, tactics or morality of his action.”

The same month Marker fired his weapon, two other protesters lodged themselves inside the Sabal Trail Pipeline. They used locks, plastic pipe, chicken wire, tape, bolts and concrete to make it difficult for authorities to remove them. One activist, Karrie Ford, apparently planned to stay for the long-haul, packing not just food and water but also disposable diapers, according to the sheriff’s incident report. The pipeline developer said it feared the protesters’ actions might have damaged the internal coating, so it had to spend $28,500 replacing that section.

Pipeline protesters also targeted Michigan’s attorney general, Bill Schuette, last summer. Video shows some 60 people congregating outside Mr. Schuette’s home, shouting obscenities and ignoring authorities’ orders not to trespass on the lawn. The protesters smeared chocolate syrup on Mr. Schuette’s driveway and windows, toilet-papered trees, dumped glitter and trampled the grass in his front yard, and pounded his door loudly, frightening his wife. “If public officials continue to threaten our safety, then we will continue to threaten their security,” one protester proclaimed.

The Dakota Access Pipeline has been the most high-profile of these controversies, with the media credulously repeating activists’ assertion that they were peaceful and prayerful. The actions of the two women in Iowa are only the latest contradictory example. In North Dakota, crime became a regular feature of the 233day Standing Rock protests, which drew as many as 10,000 activists. The protesters overwhelmed local authorities, and North Dakota had to summon law enforcement from other states to help keep the peace.

One protester, now facing several charges, allegedly fired a stolen weapon at police last October. “I still recall seeing somebody with a flex cuff, about to put it on her wrist, and—when I heard a couple of gunshots ring out,” Deputy Sheriff Rusty Schmidt from Pennington County, S.D., recounted to the court in December. “At that point I looked down, and there’s another gunshot rang out, and I could actually see the round impacting the ground right next to my knee.”

Other Standing Rock protesters threw Molotov cocktails, rocks and logs at law enforcement and consistently trespassed on private land. Local ranchers reported stolen property and slaughtered animals, while businesses told of death threats they’d received in retaliation for their support, real or imagined, of the pipeline. Activists also doxxed local law enforcement, sending at least one police officer’s family into temporary hiding.

After more than 600 arrests, the protests drew to an anticlimactic end in February. The self-proclaimed “water protectors” left behind 9.8 million pounds of garbage, including abandoned vehicles, tents, portable heaters and plastic tubs. North Dakota scrambled to clean up their detritus, fearing contaminated snow would melt and run off into the Missouri River. Some activists also abandoned their dogs, including several puppies, when they left their frigid protest camp. It’s an odd way of protecting the environment.

Ms. Melchior is an editorial writer for the Journal.