One Question Autism Researchers Never Seem to Ask.

June 5 | Posted by mrossol | CDC NIH, Health, Incentives, Science, Transparency[non], Vaccine

This made me think. Is it proof? No, but the correlation is so high [based on the author’s survey] It has given me pause considering the vaccines at this point. mrossol

June 3, 2023. By Steve Kirsch

Source: How can I be so sure that vaccines cause autism? I asked the ONE question that no autism researcher has EVER asked.

Summary of the Article

If vaccines aren’t triggering autism, then the number of times a parent notices autistic behaviors BEFORE a wellness visit where a vaccine is given should be comparable to the number of times AFTER the visit.

I asked 642 parents who had previously reported having an autistic child in previous surveys to fill out my survey. I received 308 responses.

66 parents reported first seeing autistic behaviors within a month AFTER a vaccine appointment.

0 parents reported first seeing autistic behaviors within a month BEFORE a vaccine appointment.

This is stunning. It is highly unlikely you’ll get a disparity like this if vaccines aren’t triggering autism. It’s about the same as the chance of throwing a fair coin 65 times and getting all heads: 1 chance in 3e19 which is about as “close to impossible” as you will ever find in nature.

But the more stunning thing is that no autism researcher in the world has ever even thought to ask such a question. Ever. No do they want to know either (I was told they don’t want to lose their NIH grant if they acknowledged this).

In nearly 100 years, there are no papers in the scientific literature that have ever looked at this. Zero. Zip. Nada.

If I’m wrong and autism is simply a random event no affected by vaccination, nearly every pediatrician in the world should have roughly even stats for # cases within 1 month before a vaccine appointment vs. 1 month after a vaccine appointment.

All you have to do is name one pediatrician who has more autism reports from parents 1 month before the child’s vaccination visit vs. 1 month after the child’s vaccination visit. Just one.

If vaccines don’t cause autism, then half the pediatricians in the world should have statistics that satisfy the challenge.

The fact that nobody can name a single pediatrician in the world that meets the challenge tells you everything you need to know, doesn’t it?

In addition, with just one phone call, you can prove to yourself that I’m right. Ask your own pediatrician for the <1 month before:after autism stats for her practice based on when the parent first noticed ASD behaviors. They will be VERY lopsided in every case. Or, they will simply not track this statistic in the EMR (which is very typical; you can’t find what you never look for).

My survey results

The survey.

Here’s the key question:

Survey results (record level).

Here’s a chart of the responses. The survey had 4 categories of responses for BEFORE and AFTER. But only the AFTER responses were all fully populated. The BEFORE responses of <1 month and earlier all had NO responses.

For all the categories combined for <1 month before:after, the odds ratio was 0:66. That’s really stunning. That’s extremely unlikely to happen by chance.

There were 0 responses for all the categories prior to one month (so they are missing from the chart below).

Odds for the other categories were:

  • day before:after 0:22
  • week before:after 0:42
  • month before:after 0:66

For all responses (including the sometime before:sometime after), the before:after odds were 12:196 which is 1:16 odds. That’s very significant. A 1:2 odds is a sign of a causal relationship.

Parent responses for when they first noticed autistic symptoms in their child. NOT A SINGLE PARENT could recall seeing symptoms <1 month BEFORE a scheduled wellness visit. Note that the counts are cumulative so the counts for <1 month after, for example, include the counts in the earlier categories.

The OR is 169 (95% CI 10.4 – 2747) p=.0003 and z-statistic of 3.6. This is comparing odds of an ASD symptom observation within 1 month after the shot (66:242) vs. odds of an observation within 1 month before the shot (0:308).

In short, this didn’t happen by chance. It’s a huge effect.

Surveys on Facebook autism support groups

I’ve been told that it is absolutely forbidden to do a survey like this on any Facebook support group. I tried to do such a survey and they wouldn’t even let me into the group. My membership request is still “pending.”

These groups will all kick you out if you go against “the science.”

Your survey will be immediately taken down.

So you’re not allowed to ask this question, unfortunately.

They don’t want to know the truth.  

(In history, the people who censor have never been the good guys.  not original quote from me.)

Nobody wants to know the data

Doctors treating autism don’t want to know when it occurred relative to the shot.

Few doctors will actually ask the parents when they noticed the first symptoms of ASD and put this in their medical records. If they do that, none will analyze the records.

I just got off the phone with a vaccine injured pediatrician who thinks vaccines do NOT cause autism. I asked her for the before:after stats. She said she didn’t know. Then she said she could ask her clinic but they don’t have time to pull the records. I’m serious.

Researchers looking into finding the cause of autism don’t want to know this either apparently. I talked to a top autism researcher at MIT and this person had no clue. Nor was he/she interested in exploring the topic any further.

Share

Leave a Reply

Verified by ExactMetrics