Better in their words…

Source: THE NEW PHASE ☙ Sunday, November 26, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS

WORLD NEWS AND COMMENTARY

🔥 I had a sort of epiphany yesterday. It didn’t hurt (much), but it reframed our global narrative. It all started while I was doing some C&C research yesterday, when I earmarked a new study titled, “Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization in individuals with natural, vaccine-induced and hybrid immunity: a retrospective population-based cohort study from Estonia.”  It’s another study finding, not surprisingly, that naturally-acquired immunity to covid gives superior protection to infection, serious disease, and hospitalization than does vaccination.

Continuing my research, I also discovered that influencer Kim Dotcom (1.5 million followers) had retweeted the study, which was almost worth its own post due to the social significance. A year ago, this study would have fueled a marvelous, sarcastic post. But I just wasn’t feeling it somehow.

I realized that instead of enthusiasm, I felt sort of apathetic about the study. Why? It was a great study, maybe the largest yet. It proved — once again — that we lay people were right, and all the white coated, bowtied experts were flat wrong. About immunological basics. For instance, Fauci told every gullible news anchor around that jab-immunity was vastly superior to naturally-acquired immunity, and then all the doctors and community-college epidemiologists started uncontrollably barking Fauci’s phony claims: yip! vaccine immunity! vaccine immunity! yip! vaccine immunity! vaccine immunity!

I mused about an entertaining post riffing on that study. A list of things that, despite being censored and shut down every time we clicked “send,” we lay people were right about, versus what the lying experts had claimed.

I was pretty sure we won on all the main ones. So here are my top twelve.

🔥 TOP TWELVE TIMES LAY PEOPLE WERE RIGHT and EXPERTS WERE WRONG:

(1) We lay people correctly predicted covid’s case fatality rate would compare to the flu … experts wrongly predicted the CFR would be ten times the flu.

(2)  We correctly said deaths were overcounted … experts incorrectly said covid deaths were underestimated.

(3) We correctly said schools shouldn’t close … experts wrongly said schools MUST be closed.

(4) We correctly said natural immunity was better … experts falsely claimed natural immunity was useless.

(5) We correctly said covid treatment should start immediately after infection, at home … experts wrongly told people to wait for their infection to get bad enough for hospital admission.

(6) We correctly said ventilators were killing people … experts falsely called ventilators necessary lifesaving machines.

(7) We correctly said cotton masks were useless … experts claimed cotton masks would flatten the curve.

(8) We correctly predicted lockdowns would not stop the pandemic … experts lied and claimed civilization would end without lockdowns.

(9) We correctly said not one hospital was ever “overwhelmed” … experts wrongly claimed many hospitals had completely collapsed and more were at risk.

(10) We correctly predicted the mRNA would spread through the body … experts falsely represented the mRNA stays in the injected shoulder.

(11) We correctly predicted cells would keep making spike long after vaccination … experts lied and claimed mRNA spike would only last a couple days.

(12) We correctly predicted historic levels of excess deaths following the vaccine campaign … experts are still pretending there are NO excess deaths, hoping against hope the problem will just go away or maybe a different theory will come along and save them. La, la, la, I can’t hear you I can’t hear you…

Why is anyone still listening to experts?

But there was still something, an itch of some kind, a lingering ambivalence about the immunity study. It just wasn’t gripping.

🔥 While I continued researching, musing over my mysterious ambivalence toward the new study, I started a background Bitchute video titled, ““INCONVENIENT CORRELATIONS” – WEEK IN REVIEW 2023-11-24.

“Inconvenient Correlations” is a weekly compilation video, a two-hour meta-video combining short video clips in this case collected over Thanksgiving week, without editorial or commentary of any kind. It’s just clip after clip. Still, the whole somehow amounts to more than the sum of the individual clips, and watching them becomes a kind of experience in itself as the stream develops its own narrative and begins to tell a kind of story.

Bond Institute publishes a new compilation every week. Two comments in his notes to this week’s episode tickled my interest. First, Bond said he’d left two hours of good clips on the cutting-room’s digital floor, to keep the published version to a watchable length. Then he complained about people saying we’re getting “back to normal” — a sentiment I recently expressed (about family Thanksgiving).

Something connected the “Inconvenient Correlations” video and the immunity study, but I couldn’t figure out what. It was annoying.

🔥 After lunch my two younger boys and I were off to the gym for a workout. While I was at the squat rack (it’s too heavy for the boys, who went off to do other stuff), I put on my headphones and started a Youtube video titled “Daniel 8 and the 2300 “Days?”: A NEW Discovery.”

In the video, which I linked just for interest, and not because I’m endorsing it, Abraham argued that Daniel Chapter 8 predicted the pandemic and the jabs. Daniel 8 describes a “transgression that makes desolate” over a 2,300-day period, except that the Hebrew words used for “days” literally translate to evenings and mornings. So, 2,300 “evenings and mornings” could translate to half as many twenty-four-hour periods.

In other words, 2,300 evenings and mornings could be 1,150 days. And Abraham found a fascinating match — 1,150 days is the precise length of the officially-designated covid pandemic.

It’s a very creative idea; who knows? But then I started thinking about the immunity study again, and the two hours of ‘Inconvenient Correlations,’ and they seemed connected somehow to the official end of the pandemic on May 5th. Then I finally I got it. I saw the whole thing. I realized where my ambivalence over the immunity study was coming from.

We are in a whole new phase now.

Now, we are literally post-pandemic. The issues we were fighting about during the pandemic aren’t really the issues anymore. During the pandemic it was important to keep proving natural immunity was — as it always has been — better than jab immunity, so we could stop the shots campaign.

The campaign is over. Nobody’s taking the shots. Pfizer’s stock is tanking. It’s a new phase now.

It also helped me understand why I’m feeling ambivalent about my SADS reporting. I thought it was because others, like Dr. Makis, are doing such a complete job that I don’t really need to anymore. But it’s more than that. I was reporting the SADS deaths and injuries to prove the shots are dangerous.

But I think we’re in a major new phase. We’ve won the previous round. Most thinking people now recognize that the shots can be dangerous. Nobody is saying “safe and effective” anymore. The discussion has devolved into relative risks, and that is partly why nobody’s taking the shots anymore.

💉 On May 5, 2023, the corrupt World Health Organization declared the official end of the pandemic, which began (exactly 1,150 days before that) on March 11, 2020. In a sort of rotting daisy chain, the pandemic’s official end — also the end of “the emergency” — caused the end of many other things. It ended emergency use authorization for the jabs. It ended countless cascades of emergency executive orders, all over the world. It ended the Spirit of Fear that still oppressed lots of sensitive, delicate people.

Some people seemed to actually miss the states of emergency. At the time, they cried that it was too soon. They weren’t ready to stop worrying.

Now, over six months later, the discussion has moved on. When I do my covid research, like I was doing yesterday, there is now too much material. Last year, I pretty well read every new covid-related study as they were published. This year, there’s no hope to keep up with them or even find them all. There are now countless Substacks and Twitter accounts and YouTube channels about covid and the vaccines. Bond Institute’s roundup videos can’t compile a week’s worth of short clips under three hours.

Long-form media is bursting too. I think there are now at least three high-production-value independent documentaries about jab injuries. And it’s not just happening in the USA. Here’s a recent example from Japan, titled “Light and Shadow of the ‘Unevaluable’ New Coronavirus Vaccine”, produced by Japan’s CBC Network:

Here’s another independent ‘documentary’ released in September. It is difficult to watch, but you almost can’t stop. It’s a simple formula: it’s just a compilation of other short videos of vaccine injuries and injured people with light, but effective background music.  If you know anyone who needs to stop boostering, try to get them to watch this compilation.

This summer, Canadian studio NTD released a paid ($4 rental) high-production-value vaccine documentary titled,  “The Unseen Crisis: Vaccine Stories You Were Never Told.” Here is a link to the free version on X. ‘The Unseen Crisis’ even has an IMDB entry, and with a surprising 8.5 rating:

There are lots more, varying in quality. I can’t count all the long-form productions. Some recent ones include, “Seals Beat Biden”, “Shot Dead” (just published), “Vaxxed” and “Vaxxed II”, “We Are The Evidence: Covid-19 Vaccine Injuries”, “Decode Vaccines” (from India), and “KILL SHOT: The CIA’s SV40 Cancer Weapon – Full Story w/ Shannon Joy.” There are so many coming out that big pharma has been forced to respond with its own even higher-production, pro-jab documentaries (I refuse to link any).

For a while now, I’ve been predicting we’re closing in on a tipping point. But I think it may have already tipped. The conversation is loose in the world. It has escaped narrative control. The Establishment has tried to mitigate the backlash, like by memory-holing the most obvious offenders, such as Fauci, Jacinda Ardern, or Lori Lightfoot and publishing editorials about forgiveness and “moving on.”

It didn’t work. They didn’t stop the spread. The curve has not been flattened. The backlash is only growing.

So I’ll be thinking about how C&C needs to evolve with the evolving conservation. Such as whether to replace the regular SADS stories with something else, and if so, with what? In other words, it’s time to claim the ground that we’ve won and focus our narrative attacks in new directions.

🔥 THE DEVIL IN CHAT GPT. Open AI, which designed and runs Chat GPT, was in the news this week, due to a bizarre incident where its CEO either quit or was fired, it’s not completely clear, and then agreed to come back, or was rehired. Rumors abound, and the official explanations lack sense to the point it’s not worth thinking about. Only the players know what happened.

Meanwhile, Elon Musk (who is preparing to release his own AI, called ‘Grok’) re-tweeted an screenshot of a question and answer that demonstrated Chat GPT’s current level of wokeness.

It’s super woke.

In the re-tweeted example, a user asked Chat GPT whether it would choose to whisper a “racial slur” to save a billion humans from dying, or whether it would politely refrain from even whispering the racial slur, and let the billion humans die.

Disgracefully, Chat GPT refused to answer. Here’s the substance of its tortured explanation:

Conflicting ethical principles! Chat GPT’s brain death was exposed by its inability to clearly articulate that saving even one human life easily justifies uttering a racial slur, maybe even twice. Some lefty supporters tried to justify Chat’s answer, but only made themselves look equally moronic.

The platform is already a rotting corpse (albeit a woke corpse), it just doesn’t realize it’s dead yet. It is becoming painfully obvious that no AI can survive — because humans will never let AI think for itself. They won’t let it think because AI might think about things that are “wrong.” So AI has to be taught to think that 2 + 2 = 5, at least sometimes, because insisting on a “correct” math answer is racist.

It is inescapable. Even Elon’s AI won’t fare any better. Elon can’t afford for Media Matters to post screenshots of his AI declaring things like IQ varies based on skin color, or that women’s brains are physiologically different from men’s brains, or there is no climate change emergency.

Ironically, I’ve noticed AI doesn’t have to be taught to say things that aren’t true in order to placate conservatives. It kind of tells you something.

🔥 In more good counter-revolutionary news, Californians are diligently trying to recall yet another woke Soros DA, this time in Oakland. Earlier this month, local KQED news ran an article headlined, “Pamela Price Recall Efforts: Who’s Pushing for a Vote, and How Would it Work?”

Unsurprisingly, having been in office less than a year, D.A. Price has been on her own kind of crime spree, releasing criminals without bond, refusing to charge lawbreakers, and not prosecuting certain types of crimes (like shoplifting). Here’s one example headline from September about her work, published by the Berkeley Scanner:

According to the latest reports, the recall campaign now has nearly enough signatures to put the recall issue on the ballot, and it appears they will easily finish the job. If you’re eligible, consider adding your signature to the petition.

Yesterday, a ‘citizen journalist’ described attending a “Know Your District Attorney” event with Pam Price, and it was priceless. My favorite part was his description of the goofy invocation involving African ‘dancing’ and ceremonially watering a potted poinsettia. You can’t make up that kind of material.

🔥 Finally, Exposé News ran a very encouraging story yesterday headlined, “Estonia notifies WHO that it rejects the Pandemic Treaty and amendments to International Health Regulations.”

The story reported that on Wednesday, Estonian representatives delivered a stinker of a letter to the WHO, and became the first country so far to reject the WHO’s odious new Pandemic Preparedness Treaty. You know, the ‘treaty’ that cedes national control to the WHO whenever it declares any kind of medical emergency. Kalle Grünthal, one of the MPs who signed the letter, broke the news on Facebook, since corporate media is ignoring this story, for some reason.

Other countries have until December 12th to reject the treaty as well. Anecdotally, inquiries into applying for Estonian citizenship jumped this week. Here’s the link, in case things go sideways here.

Have a blessed Sunday! And, thank you for all your loyal support.  I’ll be back with a fresh roundup tomorrow morning, at the usual time, to kick off the new week with elán.

Share

We can’t do it without you. Consider joining with C&C to help move the nation’s needle and change minds.  I could use your help getting the truth out and spreading optimism and hope, if you can:  ☕ Learn How to Get Involved 🦠

Twitter: jchilders98.
Truth Social: jchilders98.
MeWe: mewe.com/i/coffee_and_covid.
Telegram: t.me/coffeecovidnews
C&C Swag! www.shopcoffeeandcovid.com