Better in their words…

WORLD NEWS AND COMMENTARY

🌋 Yesterday, CNN reported that Iceland’s long-rumbling volcano finally blew its stack last night near the already-evacuated town of Grindavik, barely 30 miles from the country’s capital of Reykjavik. While the eruption offers some unique features, like stretching over a straight line from a long crack in the ground, the volcano doesn’t appear to threaten any world impact beyond its local area. And the icy little town appears to be fine so far.

CLIP: Watch two hours of lava spurting out of a crack in the ground (2:00:00).

🚀 Two papers in one! First, a headline from the Washington Post, yesterday morning:

Next, also from yesterday’s Washington Post, just before noon:

Did somebody wake up, read the first headline, and make a call?

🔥 The UK Guardian ran an unprecedented and historic story yesterday headlined, “Why did Colorado disqualify Trump from the state’s 2024 election ballot?” The understated headline correctly explained this “Decision is the first time a presidential candidate has been deemed ineligible for election under the insurrection clause.”

It’s just the latest bizarre turn of events in the U.S. 2024 Presidential Election Season, one more shattered record for the history books as democrats continue shredding all semblance of rationality in a surreal panic to stop Trump any way they can, no matter how zany or cockamamie of an idea. This time, applying Section 3 of the 14th Amendment — called the Insurrection Clause — the Colorado supreme court beclowned itself ruling 4-3 that Donald Trump is ineligible for any office, not even county dog catcher, because of the January 6th Capitol Riot, since he’s an insurrector, or something.

In practical terms, the decision bars Trump from appearing on Colorado’s primary ballot. It only applies in Colorado, but if it sticks, it could make Trump’s election difficult if not impossible.

“We do not reach these conclusions lightly,” the Court’s majority airily and lightly wrote. “We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction,” they frivolously continued, misapplying the law and desperately hoping the liberal public would react with unhinged accolades. The decision upheld a Colorado district court’s earlier but equally deranged 102-page judgment finding Trump was an insurrectionist by “clear and convincing evidence,” after a one-week trial.

Making their decision look less like a serious ruling and more like a virtue-signaling political hand grenade, the Colorado justices stayed the effect of their own order to allow Trump’s lawyers time for an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. I’d say the Supreme Court is bound to throw out Colorado’s awful ruling, since it is commonly-known that the Insurrection Clause was passed by angry Republicans to stop Confederate military officers like General Robert E. Lee from running for office after the Civil War.

Saying that comparing the Capitol Riot to the U.S. Civil War is deranged is an insult to deranged people.

In short order, Governor DeSantis and other Republican candidates called for the Supreme Court to reverse Colorado, and Vivek Ramaswamy vowed he’d boycott the state. The Colorado GOP threatened to “withdraw from the Primary as a Party and convert to a pure caucus system if this is allowed to stand.” If that happens, Trump could still get the GOP’s nomination through a caucus even if barred from Colorado’s primary ballot.

Do not get overly exercised about this ridiculous sideshow. It’s nearly inconceivable that the Supreme Court will allow this travesty of a sham to stand. I’m not the only one who thinks that. Last night, the Hill ran a headline predicting that Colorado’s logic is so bad that even the liberal Justices on the Supreme Court would vote to overturn in a unanimous pro-Trump decision, which would essentially ask the Colorado supremes to board the short judicial bus:

It seems inevitable we’ll soon have a whole lot more clarity about what the Insurrection Clause, which has never been used this way, does or doesn’t say. And that should finally shut up a bunch of crazed leftists, at least about this insane idea, and annoy the Supreme Court, which has to deal with all this nonsense.

🔥 Day before yesterday, I covered the “lost top-secret binder” story. An alert commenter directed me to a supplemental motion filed in a little-reported lawsuit by reporter John Solomon of Just The News. In January 2021, President Trump tasked John with publishing the declassified Crossfire Hurricane binder to the American people. This year John has been suing the Biden Administration as Trump’s “designated representative” trying to get a copy of the binder. I quickly reviewed his supplemental motion during a spare hour.

It was extremely informative.

Our useless corporate media never reported anything about John’s unprecedented lawsuit until a bare mention of the story in CNN’s article on Monday, even though John filed his case back in March. It turned out that, on the fateful evening when copies of the binder were flying all over Washington DC with deep state officials racing to collect them, John Solomon had time to quickly review a mostly-unredacted copy of the binder.

In other words, John Solomon knows what’s in the binder. In John’s supplemental motion, he described the binder’s contents a thousand times better than had CNN:

It is undisputed that the former President had the Crossfire Hurricane binder created and then declassified it to shed light on the intelligence community’s role in advancing one of the most divisive and malicious political dirty tricks in American history; that a physical binder of declassified Crossfire Hurricane records was given to the (just sworn in) Attorney General (Merrick Garland) on January 20, 2021, for specific redactions and public release; and that this binder has not been publicly released, not on the morning of January 20 and not after the Biden Administration took power at noon on that day.

Among other things, the binder contained embarrassing information about the Bureau’s officials and the government’s conduct in the case. Mr. Solomon saw “lightly redacted” versions of the fourth Crossfire Hurricane FISA warrants, a 2017 FBI 302 interview report with Christopher Steele, several tasking orders related to a second Confidential Human Source named Stefan Halper, and other documents.

For some reason, I expected the government’s arguments against releasing the binder to be stronger than they were. John Solomon’s supplemental motion described the DOJ’s two very weak arguments. First, the government made the dumb retroactive argument that, because Trump sent the binder to DOJ for redaction (as it had asked), the binder somehow magically transformed from a declassified Presidential document into a DOJ “agency record.” Therefore, mused the DOJ, the binder became subject to FOIA laws which, DOJ was sad to say, prevented the vast majority of its contents from ever being released.

Second, apparently influenced by psychedelic mushrooms, the DOJ theorized that Trump’s explicit order for them to lightly redact and then distribute the binder somehow included an implied discretion for the agency, which it utilized to decide instead to heavily redact the binder and then notdistribute it.

“Discretion” being the key word: a goofy DOJ euphemism for “disobey a direct order.” Obviously it’s a stretch.

Both arguments are legally horrible. They’re so bad it makes me wonder whether Monday’s limited hangout of the “lost binder” story was the deep state’s way to prepare the narrative battlespace for an expected judicial order in Solomon’s case forcing the government to hand the binder over to the American people — as President Trump originally intended.

I’m not just guessing; the lawsuit’s docket was highly suggestive. In June, the DOJ filed a Motion to Dismiss John’s case, but nothing’s happened with that motion so far and the docket shows lots of subsequent activity in the case. So my take is that the judge must have said something to the lawyers, probably during a hearing, suggesting the case cannot be resolved on dismissal.

On August 18th, John Solomon filed his summary judgment motion, and three weeks after that the DOJ filed its own cross-motion for summary judgment.

To me, the case looks ripe for summary judgment. John Solomon claims to have a legal right as President Trump’s “designated representative” to Trump’s “Presidential record” — the declassified binder. The DOJ raised two dumb legal arguments. Since there aren’t any disputed facts to be tried, the case should be resolved by summary judgment. And the last thing filed related to the competing summary judgment motions was on October 12th.

It’s now December. A decision on the summary judgment orders could literally come any minute now.

So here’s my guess about what’s really going on: The historic “lost DOJ binder” story ran in CNN on Monday because, one way or another, the deep state discovered that federal Judge Leon is about to rule in John Solomon’s favor, forcing the government to cough up the binder like a giant, politically-damaging hairball. So maybe the deep state used CNN trying to create a pretext for corporate media and the social media platforms to blackout any discussion of the binder and lock it down.

There are several other explosive documents pending disclosure soon. The Crossfire Hurricane binder is just one of them.

Please keep your seat belt securely fastened at all times while the ride is in motion.

🔬 After Kevin McKernan tested some mRNA vaccine vials and discovered plasmid DNA contaminants along with the SV40 promoter gene, the vaccine-industrial complex defiantly responded in two discrete phases. In phase one, they denied McKernan’s conclusions and called him a hack. Then a bunch of other labs confirmed McKernan’s findings and phase one was abruptly over.

In phase two, the white coated jab defenders quacked there was “no evidence” of any harm from the errant plasmids or from the monkey virus gene called the SV40 promoter.  That’s where we are right now, in phase two.  Well, somebody found a 2010 study in the journal Vaccine that alreadydescribed the evidence of harm.  It was titled, “Biosafety of DNA Vaccines: New Generation of DNA Vectors and Current Knowledge on The Fate of Plasmids After Injection.”

It should have been titled, “bio un-safety of DNA vaccines.”

The study is technically dense. So I fed the study’s summary into ChatGPT and asked for a lay English translation. ChatGPT said it looked bad:

The study you provided indicates that the Simian Virus 40 (SV40) has the ability to transport DNA plasmids into cell nuclei. Specifically, the SV40-based system efficiently transports plasmids into the nucleus of non-dividing cells. This is a crucial feature for gene therapy, as it means that the SV40 system can be used to deliver genetic material into the nuclei of cells that are not actively dividing, expanding the potential applications of this system in various therapeutic contexts​​.

Gene therapy. In other words, the mRNA vaccines appear to use techniques designed to modify the subject’s DNA. Ruh-roh! That’s just what they told us over and over the vaccines did not do. If the plasmids Kevin McKernan found are random contaminants, or random parts of E. coli genes, then it seems likely that some cells in people who got the jabs are being randomly engineered.

This plasmid thing, plus the previously-mentioned mistranslation defect, are quickly unraveling the jabs. As I keep saying, it’s only a matter of time.

🔬 The well-regarded Journal Cureus published a remarkable new peer-reviewed study this week titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis”. You’ll want to bookmark this study for any friends or relatives who are somehow still considering the jabs, or taking anymRNA-based jab, especially if they’ve ever recovered from cancer. The first remarkable fact was the study listed all the different cancer-promoting (oncogenic) features of the vaccines, even providing a handy-dandy visual aid helpfully charting all the different ways that mRNA jabs could possibly cause cancer:

It’s a pretty technical list, and non-med/sci folks don’t need to try understanding them all. The point is, a major journal just published a peer-reviewed paper listing eight different ways the vaccines can cause new cancers or make regressed cancers flare up again.

The CDC promised these were the safest and best-tested vaccines in human history.

Specifically, the researchers have grown concerned about something called the “multi-hit hypothesis” of cancer. It’s a theory that cancer develops not by a single event but in a gradual process caused by multiple accumulating genetic changes — called ‘hits’ — in cells. It’s kind of like stacking differently-shaped blocks until they make a wobbly tower about to topple over. Each “hit” is a new mutation or a different disruption, adding up and increasing entropy until the cell goes wonky and then … cancer.

Due to the many ways mRNA vaccines “hit” cells, as shown in a long roundup of other studies, the researchers concluded that all mRNA jabs should be pulled from the market, not just covid ones (although they didn’t say it directly). Specifically, they said since there was so much evidence the jabs promote cancer, the drugmakers should be forced to prove the shots don’tcause cancer in order to continue. It’s the “first do no harm” principle:

This comprehensive literature review aims to highlight the potential that COVID-19 genetic vaccines, particularly mRNA vaccines, have to fulfill the multi-hit hypothesis, in that they elicit a pro-tumorigenic milieu favorable to cancer progression and/or (metastatic) recurrence. Proving this potentiality wrong is a necessary step toward satisfying the first principle of medicine: “primum non nocere” (“first, do no harm”). Indeed, all global crises pose tremendous challenges to health and welfare; yet, such exceptionalities should not be a justification for lowering scientific standards.

Because some of the outlined pro-oncogenic mechanisms are antigen-independent, current safety concerns should be promptly addressed before mRNA-based nanomedicines further transform the way diseases are managed and prevented in the future.

This new Cureus study adds yet more evidence to the growing list of mRNA’s defects, which includes the recent Nature study showing the jabs create unwanted “nonsense” proteins.

🔥 Regular readers will recall my brief excursions into reporting on “medical emergencies,” which included a whole lot of bizarre, single-car accidents. I had to give up that project, due to the exigencies of time plus the fact the media euphemisms are constantly mutating, with new variants coming out faster than covid. But you can still find as many examples as you like:

Yesterday, an article published by the Australian Broadcast Company caught my eye, headlined “A significant increase in death rates on roads around the country has experts worried.”

Experts! Presumably these newly-worried experts are the same ones who constantly fretted about covid overwhelming hospitals during the pandemic. According to the story, pre-pandemic Australia enjoyed a long, steady reduction in car crash deaths.

But that’s all history now, mate; there’s a whole new epidemic going on, an epidemic of crumpled metal:

“We can’t ignore the facts; we are seeing a significant increase in death rates around the country,” Dr Crozier said. “The cumulative effect of 100 dead every month, and 100 hospitalised every day — it’s an epidemic. A tragic epidemic.”

For much of the past four decades, Australia made steady progress on the road toll — from 2,800 people died in road accidents in 1989 (down) to 1,094 by October 2020. But as the nation emerged from the COVID-19 pandemic, the road toll started to increase.

“What we’re seeing around the country in pretty much every state and territory is the numbers are going up instead of down. And that’s been happening for the last few years,” said Ingrid Johnston, CEO of the Australasian College of Road Safety.

“So, since COVID … basically, they’re going in the wrong direction,” she added.

Weird! What could possibly be causing this burgeoning epidemic of car crashes that started in 2021 or so? They’re baffled. The article awkwardly wandered from one silly hypothesis to an even kookier theory, suggesting that people may have lost their driving skills during lockdowns, or maybe the lazy cops are busy eating vegemite and just aren’t catching as many drunk drivers as they used to.

Australia Broadcasting never even considered the jabs. The reporter picked only one human interest anecdote, and that was about a guy who crashed in August 2020 — before the jabs, and before the numbers started going up. Yawn.

💉 I’ll wrap up today’s post with a little more evidence of the risks posed by the “nonsense DNA” made by the jabs. This short clip is part of an extended Rumble interview between heterodox gene scientists Kevin McKernan and Jessica Rose (2 hrs). In the clip, the two scientists discuss the latest mRNA design defect described in the peer-reviewed Nature study, the creation of “nonsense DNA,” or in technical terms, the “ribosomal frameshifting.”

CLIP: Gene scientists Kevin McKernan and Jessica Rose discuss ‘nonsense DNA’ problem (8:24).

Nothing about the science described in that clip is at all controversial. True, the public health agencies and the pharma makers will disagree with McKernan’s conclusions, but in the clip Kevin identified maybe the biggest problem with the nonsense DNA. When the pharma companies substituted n-methyl pseudouridine for natural uridine in the spike protein mRNA, they didn’t just “tweak” the spike’s genetic formula to make it longer-lasting.

Instead they created something entirely new.

There’s a huge difference between wild-type spike and pseudouridine spike: the wild-type spike protein came from natural evolutionary processes. Viruses mutate in nearly-infinite numbers until they find a new DNA formula that ‘works better’ than the current variant. “Works better” is an evolutionary concept. Viruses seek DNA formulas that don’t kill their hosts; they want to be less virulent and thus more transmissible. This is well known and commonsense.

It’s common sense because it’s how natural selection works. It’s survival of the fittest, old boy. Charlie Darwin cooked up that old gag and made a fortune.

Like me, you probably have a childlike concept of a strand of DNA that looks like a long, straight ribbon, because that’s how we were taught. But it’s wrong (of course). DNA is classically depicted as being two-dimensional, two ribbed, flat lines, like a paper bookmark. But DNA is actually three-dimensional. In addition to using a DNA formula that can be described in letter — which we erroneously think is the only important part — DNA (or RNA) also folds into a three-dimensional shape, like a delicate origami crane.

The left columns illustrate how we think of DNA, as a long, flat double-helix. On the right columns you see how a flat paper can fold into a crane, and how DNA protein is also folded into a 3-D shape.

The shape matters. The folded size and shape of DNA are just as important to what kind of protein it makes as the formula itself. It’s wild, wacky stuff; welcome to the frontiers of gene science. I call it evidence of the Hand of God, but either way, the process is a beautiful and complex miracle.

McKernan explained that, by replacing natural uridine with indestructible pseudouridine, the DOD bypassed natural evolution. And it didn’t just create an otherwise identical, longer-lasting spike mRNA. An RNA strand with n-methyl pseudouridine instead of uridine folds into a completely different shape. The scientists created something new, with a different size and shape, a new type of protein never trialed by natural selection to make sure it didn’t kill the host.

So they really have no idea what the differently-shaped spike protein might actually do. They only tested for antibodies. (And let’s not even start speculating about the risks of misfolded proteins, called prions, which is a whole different problem.)

McKernan simply labeled the idea that we could possibly beat natural evolution “hubris,” but I could think of a few more colorful words. They’d deny it, but what they’re actually doing is transhumanism at the cellular level. In this case, it’s transvirusism, but it’s the exact same idea, and they are blindly stampeding toward tinkering with human cells.

And that goal of trying to improve human cells is tantalizingly perched on the precipice of a chalk cliff of destruction.

What could go wrong? Haha. That was a rhetorical question.

The news and research on jab defects is coming in hotter and faster now, and the hits keep coming. It’s a different kind of multi-hit hypothesis: How much longer can they hold out?

Have a wonderful Wednesday! C&C and I shall both return to Gainesville tomorrow morning as the Childers family’s holiday vacation wraps, and the run-up to the Big Day begins. See you then.

Share

We can’t do it without you. Consider joining with C&C to help move the nation’s needle and change minds.  I could use your help getting the truth out and spreading optimism and hope, if you can:  ☕ Learn How to Get Involved 🦠

Twitter: jchilders98.
Truth Social: jchilders98.
MeWe: mewe.com/i/coffee_and_covid.
Telegram: t.me/coffeecovidnews
C&C Swag! www.shopcoffeeandcovid.com