Diagnosis and management of infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection – PMC

April 10 | Posted by mrossol | Health, Personal Development

Source: Diagnosis and management of infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection – PMC

2017 May; 22(2): 72–74.
Published online 2017 Apr 4. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxx002
PMCID: PMC5804742
PMID: 29479184

Diagnosis and management of infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection

Soren Gantt, MD PhD MPH FRCPC,corresponding author 1 Ari Bitnun, MD MSc FRCPC, 2 Christian Renaud, MD MSc FRCPC, 3Fatima Kakkar, MD MPH FRCPC, 3 and Wendy Vaudry, MDCM FRCPC 4

Abstract

Congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) is the most common congenital infection, occurring in approximately 0.5% of live births. Most infected newborns are asymptomatic, but up to 20% develop sensorineural hearing loss or other permanent neurologic sequelae. The presentation of newborns with symptomatic cCMV is highly variable, and the infection is usually not diagnosed in the absence of a screening program. Newborn cCMV screening programs are estimated to be beneficial and cost-effective, and are increasingly being implemented. Diagnosis requires direct detection of virus in a sample obtained before 3 weeks of life, and is best performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of saliva or urine, either of which is more sensitive than dried blood spot. Antiviral treatment of selected newborns with cCMV-related disease appears to improve hearing and neurocognitive outcomes. All infected infants should be evaluated promptly to determine appropriate therapy, and receive close audiologic and developmental follow-up.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common congenital infection and the most common cause of acquired hearing loss in childhood. There have been a number of advancements in the testing and treatment of congenital (c)CMV infection in recent years, which are outlined here along with guidance on the current best practices regarding management of infants with cCMV.

Epidemiology and burden of disease

CMV is a herpesvirus that infects approximately half of adults in North America. Infection is life-long, and is transmitted through contact with saliva, urine, breast milk, genital fluids or blood. In otherwise healthy people, CMV infection is typically asymptomatic or causes a non-specific, usually mild, febrile illness. However, when CMV is acquired congenitally, morbidity is common. cCMV occurs in roughly 1 per 150 live births, and is a major cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and other neurologic deficits among children worldwide (). It is estimated that 10–25% of all SNHL in children is due to cCMV. Although the risk of cCMV is approximately 30–40% among infants whose mothers acquire CMV during pregnancy, most infants with cCMV are born to women with evidence of pre-existing immunity ().

Of the 10–15% of infants with cCMV who are symptomatic at birth, 40–60% will go on to have permanent sequelae including SNHL, visual deficits, and/or cognitive delay (,). Evidence of central nervous system (CNS) involvement at birth portends a worse outcome (,). Among infants with cCMV who do not have symptoms at birth, between 10% and 15% will develop SNHL or other permanent sequelae by the time they start school (,). Hearing loss from cCMV can be unilateral or bilateral, vary from mild to profound, be delayed in onset and can fluctuate, but when present is usually progressive. Overall, two-thirds of congenitally-infected children who develop permanent sequelae were asymptomatic at the time of birth.

Methods and indications for cCMV testing

Congenitally-infected infants persistently shed very high levels of CMV in the saliva and urine (median >12 months) (), and these are therefore the optimal samples to test. CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of saliva or urine using a validated assay is at least as accurate as urine culture, the historical standard, and is increasingly used for diagnosis and screening (). Levels in blood are much lower than in saliva or urine, which contributes to inadequate sensitivity (30–80%) of testing dried blood spots collected at birth by PCR (,). Saliva is collected by oral (not throat) swab and is more convenient to obtain than urine. False-positive CMV PCR results are possible in breastfeeding infants tested by oral swab and confirmatory testing by urine PCR is required. The high sensitivity (97–100%) and specificity (99.9%) of saliva PCR testing as a screening method have been validated in a large population-based cohort study ().

Definitive diagnosis of cCMV requires direct detection of the virus in infants before 3 weeks of age (). The timing of sample collection is important because intrapartum and early postpartum infection is common and does not result in long-term sequelae. Thus, whenever cCMV is suspected, testing should be performed as soon after birth as possible. A negative CMV IgG serology effectively excludes congenital infection. Antibody testing is not otherwise useful for diagnosis of cCMV; the presence of CMV IgG does not differentiate between maternal or infant infection, and CMV IgM is not sufficiently sensitive or specific for congenital infection. Retrospective CMV testing of stored dried blood spots, if positive, may be helpful when the diagnosis of cCMV is considered beyond the newborn period, but a negative test does not exclude the diagnosis ().

The diagnosis of cCMV is missed for the majority of symptomatic newborns when testing depends on clinical suspicion (,). Consequently, in the absence of an alternative explanation, any clinical finding consistent with cCMV infection (Table 1) should prompt cCMV testing as soon as possible after birth. Indications for cCMV testing include failing the newborn hearing screen (). In most settings, confirmation of SNHL by auditory brainstem-evoked response (ABR) audiometry does not routinely take place until >3 weeks of age, which is too late to accurately diagnose cCMV and often beyond the period when antiviral therapy has proven benefits (see below). Therefore, testing for cCMV should take place upon hearing screen failure, prior to ABR audiometry.

Table 1.

Indications for newborn cCMV testing

• Suspected or proven primary maternal CMV infection during pregnancy
• Fetal ultrasound findings consistent with in utero CMV infection
 Intrauterine growth retardation
 Hydrops fetalis
 Brain abnormalities, including calcifications or venticulomegaly
 Hepatomegaly, splenomegaly or visceral calcifications
 Hyperechogenic bowel
 Placental enlargement
• Maternal HIV infection
• Placental CMV infection discovered on pathologic examination
• Symptoms of possible CMV disease in the newborn
 Small for gestational age
 Seizures, microcephaly, cortical atrophy, intracranial calcifications, ventriculomegaly, periventricular cysts, lenticulostriate vasculopathy, cerebellar hypoplasia, polymicrogyria, or lisencephaly
 Lethargy, hypotonia, or poor feeding
 Thrombocytopenia
 Petechiae or purpura
 Jaundice at birth
 Conjugated hyperbilirubinemia or hepatitis
 Hepatomegaly or splenomegaly
 Pneumonitis
 Chorioretinitis, retinal scarring or optic atrophy
• Failed hearing screen or proven SNHL
• Primary immunodeficiency, including positive screen for SCID

CMV Cytomegalovirus; cCMV Congenital CMV infection; HIV Human immunodeficiency virus; SCID Severe combined immunodeficiency; SNHL Sensorineural hearing loss

Algorithms for targeted cCMV screening of high-risk newborns are increasingly being adopted. For example, reflexive cCMV testing of newborns that fail the hearing screen is now mandated in parts of the USA, including Utah and Connecticut (,), and similar approaches are being piloted in parts of Canada. Although targeted screening appears cost-effective and improves cCMV diagnosis (,), this strategy by design does not identify asymptomatic newborns without hearing loss at birth, and therefore misses the majority of children who will develop cCMV-related disease (). In contrast, universal newborn cCMV screening using urine or saliva PCR would identify virtually all infected children. Universal screening has not yet been widely adopted, but appears to be both beneficial and cost-effective (,).

Evaluation of newborns with cCMV infection

Any newborn with cCMV should be evaluated without delay in order to confirm the diagnosis and determine whether antiviral therapy is indicated. Parental counseling should be provided to explain the implications of a positive test. Neonates with confirmed cCMV should be promptly seen by paediatrics, audiology and ophthalmology and undergo laboratory testing and brain imaging (Table 2). Because the evidence supporting antiviral treatment for cCMV is largely limited to studies in which therapy is initiated in the first month of life, every effort should be made to complete the work-up within this period.

Table 2.

Suggested evaluation of congenital cytomegalovirus infection

Type of evaluation Comments
Audiology Diagnostic ABR testing for all CMV positive newborns that failed the hearing screen should be performed as early as possible.*
Paediatrics Paediatric evaluation, including a complete history and physical exam with anthropometrics
Laboratory** Urine CMV viral isolation or PCR to confirm diagnosis
Complete blood count with differential
Liver function tests
BUN and serum creatinine
Consider quantitative serum CMV PCR***
Consider CSF protein, cell count and CMV PCR
Brain imaging Cranial ultrasound
Consider CT or MRI††
Ophthalmology Fundoscopic exam
Otolaryngology Indicated for those infants with confirmed SNHL
Parental counseling Families should be counseled about the natural history and standard precautions for prevention of CMV transmission to pregnant women or immunocomprised people.

ABR Auditory brainstem-evoked response; BUN Blood urea nitrogen; CSF Cerebrospinal fluid; CT Computed tomography; PCR Polymerase chain reaction; MRI Magnetic resonance imaging; SNHL Sensorineural hearing loss

*All evaluations should be completed as quickly as feasible so that antiviral therapy may be initiated at <1 month of age if cCMV-related disease is confirmed; **For infants that receive 6 months of valganciclovir treatment, laboratory monitoring is recommended weekly × 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks × 8 weeks, then every month × 3 months, with a complete blood count with differential, liver function tests, and BUN and serum creatinine (20); ***CMV levels in blood may have prognostic value (7,27); Some experts recommend lumbar puncture as part of the evaluation of cCMV central nervous system disease (28); ††Brain imaging with CT or MRI should be considered for abnormal findings on neurologic exam or cranial ultrasound. Some experts recommend CT or MRI on all infected infants.

Antiviral treatment for cCMV infection

Strong evidence from two NIH-sponsored randomized controlled trials supports antiviral treatment of symptomatic cCMV with neurologic involvement (,). In the earlier study, intravenous ganciclovir for 6 weeks, initiated within 1 month of birth, was shown to reduce progression of hearing loss at 6 months of age in children with baseline neurologic, ophthalmologic or hearing impairment (). More recently, a randomized placebo-controlled trial of 6 weeks versus 6 months of valganciclovir given to newborns with symptomatic cCMV found that the longer treatment duration was associated with modestly better hearing at 12 and 24 months of age after adjusting for CNS involvement (). Neurodevelopmental outcomes, including Bailey-III language-composite and higher receptive communication scale scores at 24 months of age were also higher in the longer treatment group after adjustment for CNS involvement, prematurity, and age of starting treatment.

Based on these data, the standard treatment for symptomatic cCMV is valganciclovir 16 mg/kg/dose twice daily for 6 months (); at this time, there is no evidence for longer treatment. There is equipoise among experts regarding treatment of newborns with milder disease, for example isolated SNHL, mild thrombocytopenia or slight intrauterine growth retardation (,). However, newborns with clear symptoms of cCMV, especially CNS involvement, should be treated (,,). Starting antiviral therapy at >30 days of life is of uncertain benefit although case series suggest efficacy (,), and controlled trials of late-onset disease are ongoing. Currently, there are no data to support antiviral therapy to prevent late-onset disease in infants with asymptomatic cCMV.

The major risk of ganciclovir is reversible neutropenia, but thrombocytopenia and hepatotoxicity are also reported (). Neutropenia appears less common with valganciclovir, and treatment discontinuation is rarely needed (,). Laboratory monitoring of complete blood cell counts and renal and liver function in infants treated with valganciclovir is nevertheless required () (Table 2). The potential for adverse reproductive effects and carcinogenicity based on animal studies should be acknowledged, but these have not been observed in humans. Because of these complexities, treatment of cCMV should be discussed with a specialist in paediatric infectious diseases.

Follow-up care of cCMV-infected infants

All infants with cCMV should have close audiologic follow-up, to monitor for progression or development of SNHL for 6 years (), or longer in consultation with an audiologist (). Monitoring for developmental delay and learning disability is also important. Follow-up of infants for specific complications of cCMV should be individualized based on severity and other factors by the relevant specialty services (e.g., otolaryngology, ophthalmology, developmental paediatrics). Infection control issues should be addressed with families of children with cCMV infection (). These children do not require isolation if hospitalized or restrictions on childcare attendance. However, due to prolonged CMV shedding by infected children, hand hygiene is recommended and avoidance of contact with saliva and urine are advised for pregnant women or immunocompromised individuals.

Conclusions

cCMV is common and causes substantial morbidity. Prompt identification and treatment can improve hearing and cognitive outcomes. The diagnosis is made by CMV PCR or culture from saliva or urine collected prior to 3 weeks of age. Because clinical suspicion of infection is insensitive, targeted or universal newborn screening programs should be encouraged (). All children with cCMV need close follow-up to monitor for hearing loss or other neurocognitive sequelae. Family practitioners, paediatricians and infectious disease specialists should be familiar with cCMV in order to facilitate the diagnosis and management of infected children.

References

1. Boppana SB, Ross SA, Fowler KB. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: clinical outcome. Clin Infect Dis 2013;4(57 suppl):S178–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] []
2. Britt W. Controversies in the natural history of congenital human cytomegalovirus infection: the paradox of infection and disease in offspring of women with immunity prior to pregnancy. Medical microbiology and immunology2015;204(3):263–71. [PubMed] []
3. Alarcon A, et al. Clinical, biochemical, and neuroimaging findings predict long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 2013;163(3):828–34 e821. [PubMed] []
4. Noyola DE, et al. Early predictors of neurodevelopmental outcome in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 2001;138(3):325–31. [PubMed] []
5. Pass RF, Stagno S, Britt WJ, Alford CA. Specific cell-mediated immunity and the natural history of congenital infection with cytomegalovirus. J Infect Dis 1983;148(6):953–61. [PubMed] []
6. Noyola DE, et al. Cytomegalovirus urinary excretion and long term outcome in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Congenital CMV Longitudinal Study Group. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19(6):505–10. [PubMed] []
7. Forner G, Abate D, Mengoli C, Palu G, Gussetti N. High Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia predicts CMV sequelae in asymptomatic congenitally infected newborns born to women with primary infection during pregnancy. J Infect Dis2015;212(1):67–71. [PubMed] []
8. Boppana SB, et al. Saliva polymerase-chain-reaction assay for cytomegalovirus screening in newborns. N Engl J Med2011;364(22):2111–118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] []
9. Boppana SB, et al. Dried blood spot real-time polymerase chain reaction assays to screen newborns for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Jama 2010;303(14):1375–1382. [PMC free article] [PubMed] []
10. Kimberlin DW, David W, Sarah S. Long, Michael T. Brady, Mary Ann Jackson, eds. Red book: 2015 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases/Committee on Infectious Diseases, 30th edn. Elk Grove: American Academy of Pediatrics. J Pediatr; 2016;169:316–7. []
11. Sorichetti B, et al. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection is underdiagnosed in British Columbia. J Pediatr2016;169:316–7. [PubMed] []
12. Vaudry W, Lee BE, Rosychuk RJ. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Canada: Active surveillance for cases diagnosed by paediatricians. Paediatrics & child health 2014;19(1):e1–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] []
13. American Academy of Pediatrics JCoIH. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 2007;120(4):898–921. [PubMed] []
14. Bufano P. CMV: new Utah law requires targeted testing. Hearing J 2013;66(8). []
15. Connecticut Department of Public Health. Early hearing detection and intervention program Congenital Cytomegalovirus (CMV) page for parents and providers. 2015. http://www.ct.gov/dph/cwp/view.asp?a=3138&q=527824
16. Bergevin A, Zick C, McVicar SB, Park AH. Cost-benefit analysis of targeted hearing directed early testing for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. International Journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2015;79(12):, 2090–3. [PubMed] []
17. Gantt S. et al. Cost-effectiveness of universal and targeted newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. JAMA Pediatr 2016;. 170 (12): 1173–80. [PubMed] []
18. Cannon MJ, Griffiths PD, Aston V, Rawlinson WD. Universal newborn screening for congenital CMV infection: what is the evidence of potential benefit? Rev Med Virol 2014. ;24(5):291–307. [PMC free article] [PubMed] []
19. Kimberlin DW, et al. Effect of ganciclovir therapy on hearing in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease involving the central nervous system: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pediatr 2003;143(1):16–25. [PubMed] []
20. Kimberlin DW, et al. Valganciclovir for symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease. N Engl J Med2015;372(10):933–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] []
21. Gwee A, Curtis N, Garland SM, Connell TG, Daley AJ. Question 2: which infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection benefit from antiviral therapy? Archives of Disease in Childhood 2014;99(6):597–601. [PubMed] []
22. Harrison GJ. Current controversies in diagnosis, management, and prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus: updates for the pediatric practitioner. Pediatr Ann 2015;44(5):E115–25. [PubMed] []
23. del Rosal T, et al. Treatment of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection beyond the neonatal period. J Clin Virol 2012;55(1):72–4. [PubMed] []
24. Amir J, Attias J, Pardo J. Treatment of late-onset hearing loss in infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2014;53(5):444–8. [PubMed] []
25. Gwee A, Curtis N, Connell TG, Garland S, Daley AJ. Ganciclovir for the treatment of congenital cytomegalovirus: what are the side effects? Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014;33(1):115. [PubMed] []
26. Goderis J, et al. Hearing loss and congenital CMV infection: A systematic review. Pediatrics 2014;134(5):972–82. [PubMed] []
27. Bradford RD, et al. Detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA by polymerase chain reaction is associated with hearing loss in newborns with symptomatic congenital CMV infection involving the central nervous system. J Infect Dis2005;191(2):227–33. [PubMed] []
28. Troendle Atkins J, et al. Polymerase chain reaction to detect cytomegalovirus DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid of neonates with congenital infection. J Infect Dis 1994;169(6):1334–37. [PubMed] []
29. Demmler-Harrison GJ. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: the Elephant in our living room. JAMA Pediatr 2016; 170(12): 1142–4. [PubMed] []
Share

Leave a Reply

Verified by ExactMetrics